Herald Maverick 125 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Compare Specifications of Herald Maverick 125 and Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Selected Bikes

Herald Maverick 125
Herald Maverick 125

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Single Four Stroke Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Ignition Electric ignition --
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 9.8 HP 89 Hp @7400 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 110 Nm @ 3950 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Manual 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Tubular steel with aluminium cradle
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front Avon Roadrider tyre 90/90-21
Rear Avon Roadrider tyre 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM Spoke ,17′ front wheel Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
Brakes
Front -- Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Rear -- Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Suspension
Front -- Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel
Rear -- Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors Matt Black
Silver
Yellow Gloss
Gunmetal Grey
Blue Metallic
Green Metallic
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1250 mm
Weight 121 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 207
Handlebar Width -- 905
Seat Height 885 870
Wheelbase -- 1570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features - Licence CBT/A1 --
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with brushed high level silencers
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 5.09 in (129.2 mm)
Fuel Consumption : 4.9 l/100 km (58 MPG)
CO2 Figures : 113.0 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4583