Honda 2022 Montesa Cota 4rt 301rr Race Replica vs Husqvarna TE 300i

Compare Specifications of Honda 2022 Montesa Cota 4rt 301rr Race Replica and Husqvarna TE 300i

Selected Bikes

Honda 2022 Montesa Cota 4rt 301rr Race Replica
Honda 2022 Montesa Cota 4rt 301rr Race Replica

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna TE 300i
Husqvarna TE 300i

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 298.00 cc 293.20 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled single-cylinder four-stroke 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch -- Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics
Fuel System Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI) 28mm throttle body --
Ignition Electronically controlled digital transistorized --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled --
Seating Capacity 1 --
Climbing Degree -- 63.5 °
Transmission Close-ratio five-speed transmission 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain Final Drive #520 Chain, 10T/41T --
Battery -- Li-Ion battery
Frame -- Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Chain -- X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Tyres
Front 2.75-21 Michelin --
Rear 4.00-R18 Michelin --
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front Single 185mm hydraulic disc with 4-piston caliper and sintered metal pads 260 mm Disc brake
Rear Single 150mm hydraulic disc with 2-piston caliper and sintered metal pads 220 mm Disc brake
Suspension
Front 39mm Showa telescopic fork; preload, compression damping and rebound damping adjustment; 6.2-inch stroke WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm
Rear Pro-Link system w/ Showa shock; preload rebound damping adjustment; 6.7 Inches WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors Ross White --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 106.2 kg
Kerb Weight 73 --
Seat Height 681 950
Wheelbase 1321 mm --
Ground Clearance 310 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 2 litres 8.5 litres
Overview
Features - Pgm-Fi Engine
- Kickstart Lever
- Three-Ring Piston
- Premium Suspension
- Dual-Map Ecu
- Advanced Engineering
--
Additional Details - Valve Train: SOHC, four-valve
- Rake (Caster Angle): 24.5°
- Trail: 2.3 inches
CO2 Emissions : 64.5 g/km
EMS : AET digital
Fuel Consumption : 2.79 l/100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1442