Honda 400X 2022 vs Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition

Compare Specifications of Honda 400X 2022 and Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition

Selected Bikes

Honda 400X 2022
Honda 400X 2022

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition
Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 349.70 cc
Engine Water-cooled 4-stroke DOHC 4-valve in-line 2-cylinder
Engine model: NC56E
DOHC 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Pumped splash combination type --
Clutch Wet multi-plate coil spring type Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics
Fuel System Electronic type --
Ignition Full transistor battery ignition --
Cooling System Water-cooled --
Maximum Power 46 PS @ 9000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 39 NM @ 7500 RPM --
Climbing Degree -- 63.5 °
Transmission Always meshing 6-stage return 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Gear ratio
1st speed : 3.285
2nd speed: 2.105
3rd speed: 1.600
4th speed: 1.300
5th speed: 1.150
6 speed: 1.043
Reduction ratio (1st order / 2nd order) : 2.029 / 3.000
--
Battery -- Li - ion Battery
Display Digital Display --
Frame Diamond Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Fork -- WP XPLOR 48 front fork
Chain -- X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110 / 80R19M / C 59H --
Rear 160 / 60R17M / C 69H --
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic double disc 260 mm Disc brake
Rear Hydraulic disc 220 mm Disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Rear Swing arm type (Prolink) WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Glare White --


Physical Specs
Length 2140 mm --
Width 830 mm --
Height 1380 mm --
Weight 199 kg 106.8 kg
Seat Height 800 950
Wheelbase 1435 mm --
Ground Clearance 150 mm 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 8.5 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Caster angle (degrees) : 27 ° 30'
Trail amount (mm) : 108
CO2 Emissions : 89.2 g/km
EMS : Keihin EMS
Fuel Consumption : 3.83 l/100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5409