Honda 400X 2022 vs KTM RC 390 2021

Compare Specifications of Honda 400X 2022 and KTM RC 390 2021

Selected Bikes

Honda 400X 2022
Honda 400X 2022

Brand:

Model:

KTM RC 390 2021
KTM RC 390 2021

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Motor -- 42.9 HP
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 373.00 cc
Engine Water-cooled 4-stroke DOHC 4-valve in-line 2-cylinder
Engine model: NC56E
1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Pumped splash combination type Wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-plate coil spring type PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated
Fuel System Electronic type --
Ignition Full transistor battery ignition --
Cooling System Water-cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 46 PS @ 9000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 39 NM @ 7500 RPM --
Climbing Degree -- 66.5 °
Transmission Always meshing 6-stage return 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain Gear ratio
1st speed : 3.285
2nd speed: 2.105
3rd speed: 1.600
4th speed: 1.300
5th speed: 1.150
6 speed: 1.043
Reduction ratio (1st order / 2nd order) : 2.029 / 3.000
--
Display Digital Display --
Frame Diamond Steel trellis frame, powder coated
Chain -- 520 X-Ring
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110 / 80R19M / C 59H --
Rear 160 / 60R17M / C 69H --
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic double disc 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc
Rear Hydraulic disc 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper, brake disc
ABS -- Bosch 9.1 MB Two Channel ABS (disengageable)
Suspension
Front Telescopic 125 mm WP APEX 43
Rear Swing arm type (Prolink) 150 mm WP APEX - Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Glare White --


Physical Specs
Length 2140 mm --
Width 830 mm --
Height 1380 mm --
Weight 199 kg 149 kg
Seat Height 800 820
Wheelbase 1435 mm --
Ground Clearance 150 mm 178.5 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 9.5 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Caster angle (degrees) : 27 ° 30'
Trail amount (mm) : 108
CO2 EMISSIONS : 82 g/km
EMS : Bosch EMS with RBW
FUEL CONSUMPTION : 3.52 l/100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6718