Honda CB300R Neo Sports Cafe 2022 vs Husqvarna TE 250i

Compare Specifications of Honda CB300R Neo Sports Cafe 2022 and Husqvarna TE 250i

Selected Bikes

Honda CB300R Neo Sports Cafe 2022
Honda CB300R Neo Sports Cafe 2022

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna TE 250i
Husqvarna TE 250i

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Petrol
Engine Displacement 286.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, Single cylinder,DOHC, 4-valve 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch Wet, multi plate hydraulic clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics
Fuel System PGM-FI --
Maximum Power 31 HP @ 8500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 27.5 NM/7500 RPM --
Climbing Degree -- 63.5 °
Transmission 6-speed --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain Final Drive: Chain --
Battery 12V-7AH Li-Ion battery
Display LCD showing speed, engine rpm, fuel level and gear position --
Frame Steel diamond frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Chain -- X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110/70R17M/C 54H --
Rear 150/60R17M/C 65H --
Wheel / RIM Wheels Front: 17inch
Wheels Rear: 17inch
Spoke
Brakes
Front 296mm hubless floating disc with radial-mount Nissin 4-piston caliper 260 mm Disc brake
Rear 220mm disc with single piston caliper 220 mm Disc brake
ABS 2 channel with IMU --
Suspension
Front 37mm telescopic fork, 130mm stroke WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Rear Monoshock damper, Pro-Link swingarm, 107mm travel WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2012 mm --
Width 802 mm --
Height 1052 mm --
Weight -- 106.2 kg
Kerb Weight 143 --
Seat Height 799 950
Wheelbase 1352 mm --
Ground Clearance 151 mm 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.0 litres 8.5 litres
Overview
Features Wide-Ranging Handling and Braking Ability
EURO5 compliant.
Engineered To Make An Owner Proud
--
Additional Details C02 Emissions (g/km): 72
Caster Angle: 24°
Fuel Consumption: 30.2km/l (WMTC mode)
CO2 Emissions : 59 g/km
EMS : AET digital
Fuel Consumption : 2.55 l/100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4775