Honda CBR650F vs Kawasaki Ninja 650 Tourer

Compare Specifications of Honda CBR650F and Kawasaki Ninja 650 Tourer

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR650F
Honda CBR650F

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Ninja 650 Tourer
Kawasaki Ninja 650 Tourer

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.00 cc 649.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled 4-stroke 16-valve DOHC inline-4 Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin, DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, semi‑dry sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System PGM-FI Fuel injection: Ø 36 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Ignition -- Digital
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 68 PS @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 64 NM @ 6700 RPM
Transmission 6 speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-n-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Trellis, high-tensile steel
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70-17 120/70ZR17M/C (58W)
Rear 180/55-17 160/60ZR17M/C (69W)
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Dual hydraulic disc 320 mm, 2-channel ABS Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs. Caliper: Dual piston
Rear Hydraulic disc 240 mm, 2-channel ABS Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single-piston
Suspension
Front 41 mm SDBV telescopic fork 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear Monoshock damper with adjustable preload, 128 mm travel Horizontal Back-link with adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Grand Prix Red and Matte Gunpowder Black Metallic Lime Green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Pearl Flat Stardust White / Metallic Flat Spark Black
Metallic Spark Black


Physical Specs
Length 2110 mm 2055 mm
Width 755 mm 740 mm
Height 1145 mm 1145 mm
Weight 213 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 193
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1450 mm 1410 mm
Ground Clearance 150 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17.3 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features -- - ECONOMICAL RIDING INDICATOR
- SMARTPHONE CONNECTIVITY
- TFT Colour Instrumentation
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.095 (88/42)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.438 (39/16)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.714 (36/21)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.111 (30/27)
Gear Ratios 5th : 0.966 (28/29)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.852 (23/27)
Final reduction ratio : 3.067 (46/15)
Fuel consumption : 35 kW kit 4.5 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 35 kW kit 107 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3408