Honda CBR650F vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Honda CBR650F vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Honda CBR650F and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR650F Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	649.00 cc	689.00 cc
Engine	Liquid-cooled 4-stroke 16-valve DOHC inline-4	Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Engine Starting	Electric	--
Fuel System	PGM-FI	Fuel injection
Transmission	6 speed	6-speed; multiplate wet clutch; with Assist & Slipper clutch
Gear Shift Pattern	1-N-2-3-4-5-6	--
Drivetrain	--	Final Drive: Chain

Tyres

Front	120/70-17	120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22F
Rear	180/55-17	180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22R
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	--

Brakes

Front	Dual hydraulic disc 320 mm, 2-channel ABS	298mm dual disc hydraulic with ABS
Rear	Hydraulic disc 240 mm, 2-channel ABS	245mm disc hydraulic with ABS

Suspension

Front	41 mm SDBV telescopic fork	Telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel, adjustable for preload, rebound and compression
Rear	Monoshock damper with adjustable preload, 128 mm travel	Linked-type Monocross shock, adjustable preload and rebound; 5.1-in travel

Colors Available

Colors

Grand Prix Red and Matte Gunpowder Black Metallic

Heritage White/Redline

Physical Specs

Length	2110 mm	2070 mm
Width	755 mm	706 mm
Height	1145 mm	1160 mm
Weight	213 kg	--
Seat Height	--	835
Wheelbase	1450 mm	1394 mm
Ground Clearance	150 mm	134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	17.3 litres	13 litres

Overview

Features	--	Digital LCD Instrumentation Linear Torque with Smooth Acceleration Quick Shift System for Smooth Upshifts Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Additional Details	--	Rake (Caster Angle): 23.7° Trail: 3.5 in Fuel Economy: 58 MPG Wet Weight: 414 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

2221