Honda CBR650F vs Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Compare Specifications of Honda CBR650F and Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR650F
Honda CBR650F

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)
Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.00 cc 600.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled 4-stroke 16-valve DOHC inline-4 Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC , Inline, 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System PGM-FI Fuel injection
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline
Ignition -- TCI
Maximum Power -- 57.0 kW @ 10000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 59.7 NM @ 8500 RPM
Transmission 6 speed Constant mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Chain
Battery -- 12 V, 10.0 Ah
Frame -- Diamond shape
Gear -- Gear ratio 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th/6th : 2.846 (37/13), 1.947 (37/19), 1.556(28/18), 1.333 (32/24), 1.190 (25/21), 1.083 (26/24)
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70-17 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) tubeless
Rear 180/55-17 160/60 ZR17M/C (69W) tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front wheel travel : 130 mm
Rear wheel travel : 130 mm
Brakes
Front Dual hydraulic disc 320 mm, 2-channel ABS 298 mm Dual disc Brake
Rear Hydraulic disc 240 mm, 2-channel ABS 245 mm Single disc Brake
Suspension
Front 41 mm SDBV telescopic fork Telescopic forks
Rear Monoshock damper with adjustable preload, 128 mm travel Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Grand Prix Red and Matte Gunpowder Black Metallic --


Physical Specs
Length 2110 mm 2120 mm
Width 755 mm 800 mm
Height 1145 mm 1285 mm
Weight 213 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 241
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1450 mm 1440 mm
Ground Clearance 150 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17.3 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Siren & speaker
- Document box
- Side cases (Photo)
- Engine guard
- Anti-lock brake system (ABS)
- High windshield
- Raised handlebars
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 3.4 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 1.955 (86/44)
Secondary reduction ratio : 2.875 (46/16)
Caster angle : 26°
Trail : 103 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3790