Honda Giorno vs KSR Sirion 50

Compare Specifications of Honda Giorno and KSR Sirion 50

Selected Bikes

Honda Giorno
Honda Giorno

Brand:

Model:

KSR Sirion 50
KSR Sirion 50

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 49.00 cc 50.00 cc
Engine AF74E / water-cooled 4-stroke OHC single cylinder 4-stroke
Engine Starting Electric and Kick --
Fuel System Electronic type --
Ignition Full transistor battery ignition --
Cooling System Water-cooled Air-cooled
Maximum Power 4.5 PS @ 8000 RPM 3 PS @ 6500 RPM
Maximum Torque 4.1 NM @ 6000 RPM --
Transmission Continuously variable transmission (V-matic) CVT
Display Clock display Digital
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 80 / 100-10 46J 120/70-12
Rear 80 / 100-10 46J 130/70-12
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front -- Wave disc
Rear -- Drum brake
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Virgin beige
Pearl Deep Mud Gray
Matt Armored Green Metallic
Puco Blue
Red, grey


Physical Specs
Length 1650 mm --
Width 670 mm --
Height 1035 mm --
Weight 81 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 95
Seat Height 720 --
Wheelbase 1180 mm --
Ground Clearance 105 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 4.5 litres --
Overview
Features - Elegant chic individual style
- Fuel-efficient engine "eSP" with light driving
- Automatically stops the engine and contributes to fuel efficiency and the environment
- Well-balanced braking gives you plenty of room for driving
- Convenient storage of helmets and small items
- Charging your smartphone
- Large multi-reflector headlight & tail lamp
- Push-cancel type turn signal switch
- Seat opener switch that can be opened with one touch
- Maintenance-free battery that does not require refilling
- Center stand that can be hung with light force
Chrome-Look Applications
Aluminium Running Boards
A Seat With Red Stitching
Modern, Economical Four-Stroke Engine
Additional Details Fuel consumption rate * 2: 80.0 km / L
Minimum turning radius (m): 1.8 1.8
Emission standard: Euro 4
Fuel consumption: 2.0 l/100 km
CO2 emissions: 46 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8042