Honda Montesa Cota 301RR vs Husqvarna 2023 TE 300

Compare Specifications of Honda Montesa Cota 301RR and Husqvarna 2023 TE 300

Selected Bikes

Honda Montesa Cota 301RR
Honda Montesa Cota 301RR

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 TE 300
Husqvarna 2023 TE 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 298.00 cc 293.20 cc
Engine LIiquid-Cooled single-cylinder four-stroke SOHC, four-valve 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting -- Electric starter
Clutch -- DDS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics
Fuel System Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI) 28mm throttle body --
Ignition Electronically controlled digital transistorized --
Cooling System LIiquid-Cooled --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission Close-ratio five-speed transmission 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Frame -- Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Tyres
Front 80/100-21 Michelin --
Rear 120/100-R18 Michelin --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front Single 185mm hydraulic disc with 4-piston caliper and sintered metal pads Disc brake 260 mm
Rear Single 150mm hydraulic disc with 2-piston caliper and sintered metal pads Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front 39mm Tech telescopic fork w/ aluminum tubes; preload, compression damping and rebound damping adjustment; 6.6 in. stroke WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear Pro-Link® system w/ Showa shock; preload rebound damping adjustment; 6.7 inches WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors Sonic Grey --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 106.4 kg
Kerb Weight 73 --
Seat Height 678 950
Wheelbase 1320 mm --
Ground Clearance 309 mm 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 1.89 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features - Dual-map ECU - Composite carbon fibre subframe
- Integrated cooling and radiators
- Hydraulic brakes
- Hydraulic clutch
- Bodywork
- Electric start and wiring harness
- Engine management system
Additional Details -- EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9159