Honda Montesa Cota 4RT260 vs Husqvarna 2023 TX 300

Compare Specifications of Honda Montesa Cota 4RT260 and Husqvarna 2023 TX 300

Selected Bikes

Honda Montesa Cota 4RT260
Honda Montesa Cota 4RT260

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 TX 300
Husqvarna 2023 TX 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 259.00 cc 293.20 cc
Engine Liquid-Cooled, single-cylinder, four-stroke, SOHC, four-valves 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting -- Electric starter
Clutch -- Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Fuel System Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI) --
Ignition Electronically controlled digital transistorized --
Cooling System Liquid-Cooled --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission Close-ratio five-speed transmission 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Frame -- Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Tyres
Front 2.75-21 Dunlop --
Rear 4.00-18 Dunlop --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front Single 185mm hydraulic disc with 4-piston caliper and sintered metal pads Disc brake 260 mm
Rear Single 150mm hydraulic disc with 2-piston caliper and sintered metal pads Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front 39mm Tech cartridge-type telescopic fork w/ preload extension adjustments; 6.6 inches of travel WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear Pro-Link® system, R16V single shock absorber w/ preload extension adjustments; 6.7 inches of travel WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors Ross White --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 100.3 kg
Kerb Weight 77 --
Seat Height 650 948
Wheelbase 1320 mm --
Ground Clearance 335 mm 354 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 1.89 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features -- - Polyamide-reinforced aluminium subframe
- Hydraulic Brakes
- Hydraulic Clutch
- DDS Clutch
- Protaper handlebar
- ODI grips
- EFI
- E Start
- Map Switch
- EMS
- Hour Meter
- Start/stop switch
Additional Details -- EMS: Vitesco Technologies EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 305 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 293 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6932