Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125 vs QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125 and QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125
Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125

Brand:

Model:

QJ Motor QJ125-9H
QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine 4-Stroke,Single Cylinder,OHV 2V
Engine Starting Electric starter Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps Forced and Splash
Clutch -- Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 14.7 PS 10 HP @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 8.5 NM @ 7500 RPM
Seating Capacity 2 2
Transmission 6-speed Chain
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Display Digital Classic Design with round meters
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated Type : Cradle / Steel
Headlamp LED Round headlight
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front -- 2.75-18
Rear -- 3.50-16
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front ByBre, opposed four-piston caliper, brake disc 320 mm Mechanical Drum
Rear ByBre, single-piston, floating caliper, brake disc 230 mm Mechanical Drum
ABS two channel Bosch 10.1MB --
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43 Telescopic
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2000 mm
Width -- 820 mm
Height -- 1090 mm
Weight 146 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 120
Seat Height 835 --
Wheelbase -- 1320 mm
Ground Clearance 145 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 litres 12.0 litres
Overview
Features - Wheels and tyres
- Controlzone and triple clamp
- LED Lights
- Low Profile seat
- Tank and filler cap
- Single 2-step Seat provides a comfortable ride for the rider and passenger
- Tested and Improved Engine Components for tough using conditions
- Study frame design and low Fuel Consumption
Additional Details Co2 Emissions: 50 G/Km
Ems: Bosch Ems
Steering Head Angle: 65 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 142 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 142 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

806