Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 401 vs Husqvarna 2023 FC 350

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 401 and Husqvarna 2023 FC 350

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 401
Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 401

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 FC 350
Husqvarna 2023 FC 350

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 373.00 cc 349.70 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric starter
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps --
Clutch PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 42.9 PS --
Seating Capacity 2 1
Transmission 6-speed 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Chain: X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Display Digital --
Frame Chrome-moly tubular space frame, powder-coated Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front ByBre, opposed four-piston caliper, brake disc 320 mm Disc brake 260 mm
Rear ByBre, single-piston, floating caliper, brake disc 230 mm Disc brake 220 mm
ABS two channel Bosch 10.1MB --
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43 WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 152 kg 102 kg
Seat Height 835 939
Ground Clearance 145 mm 336 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features - Controlzone And Triple Clamp
- Tank And Filler Cap
- High-Quality Foam And Leather Fabric Seat
- Latest Led Technology
- DS clutch
- Lightweight frame
- Polyamide-reinforced aluminium subframe
- CNC machined triple clamps
- Functional bodywork
- Hydraulic clutch
- Hydraulic brakes
- ProTaper handlebar
- ODI grips
- Map select switch
- Quickshift
- Traction Control
Additional Details Co2 Emissions: 77 G/Km
Ems: Bosch Ems
Fuel Consumption: 3.6 L/100 Km
Steering Head Angle: 65 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 142 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 142 Mm
EMS: Keihin EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 305 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 293 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4517