Husqvarna 2023 FC 250 vs Yamaha 2020 WR250R

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 2023 FC 250 and Yamaha 2020 WR250R

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 2023 FC 250
Husqvarna 2023 FC 250

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2020 WR250R
Yamaha 2020 WR250R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.90 cc 250.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine liquid-cooled DOHC 4-stroke; 4 valves
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Clutch Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Ignition -- TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Seating Capacity 1 --
Transmission 5-speed Constant-mesh 6-speed, multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 80/100-21
Rear -- 120/80-18
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc brake 260 mm Hydraulic single disc, 250mm
Rear Disc brake 220 mm Hydraulic single disc, 230mm
Suspension
Front WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm Inverted fork, fully adjustable; 10.6-in travel
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Single shock, fully adjustable; 10.6-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2174 mm
Width -- 810 mm
Height -- 1229 mm
Weight 101.2 kg 133.81 kg
Seat Height 939 929
Wheelbase -- 1419 mm
Ground Clearance 336 mm 299 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7 litres 7.57 litres
Overview
Features - DS clutch
- Lightweight frame
- Polyamide-reinforced aluminium subframe
- CNC machined triple clamps
- Functional bodywork
- Hydraulic clutch
- Hydraulic brakes
- ProTaper handlebar
- ODI grips
- Map select switch
- Quickshift
- Traction Control
- YZ-F Developed Dual-Sport
- Dirt-Focused Performance
- Advanced Fuel-Injected Engine
- Full-Adjustable Suspension
- Narrow, Rider-Focused Ergonomics
- Racing-Derived Saddle
- High-Visibility Lighting
Additional Details EMS: Keihin EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 305 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 293 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2708