Husqvarna 2023 TC 250 vs Sherco 250 Scf Factory

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 2023 TC 250 and Sherco 250 Scf Factory

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 2023 TC 250
Husqvarna 2023 TC 250

Brand:

Model:

Sherco 250 Scf Factory
Sherco 250 Scf Factory

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 248.43 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine 4 stroke DOHC, 4 valve Sherco Technology
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics Hydraulic, multidisc in oil bath
Fuel System -- Synerject digital electonic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Seating Capacity 1 --
Transmission 5-speed 6 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Battery -- Shido LTZ5S Lithium
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel High strength Chrome-Molybdenum steel semi-perimeter
Tyres
Front -- 1,60 x 21" Blue anodized Excel rim with Michelin Enduro Competition
Rear -- 2,15 x 18" Blue anodized Excel rim with Michelin Enduro Competition
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc brake 260 mm 260 mm Brembo Hydraulic
Rear Disc brake 220 mm 220 mm Hydraulic disc
Suspension
Front WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm KYB Fork Double closed cartridge with hydraulic setting and fork springs specific to each model
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage KYB Shock Absorber With hydraulic setting and spring setting specific to each model 3-way adjustment
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 99.6 kg --
Seat Height 939 --
Wheelbase -- 1480 mm
Ground Clearance 346 mm 355 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7 litres 9.7 litres
Overview
Features - DS Clutch
- Chromium molybdenum frame
- Polyamide-reinforced aluminium subframe
- WP XACT front suspension
- Functional bodywork
- Hydraulic clutch
- Hydraulic brakes
- ProTaper handlebar
- ODI grips
- E-Start
- Map switch
- Hour meter
--
Additional Details EMS: Vitesco Technologies EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 305 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 293 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1447