Husqvarna 2023 TE 150 vs QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 2023 TE 150 and QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 2023 TE 150
Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Brand:

Model:

QJ Motor QJ125-9H
QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 143.99 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine 4-Stroke,Single Cylinder,OHV 2V
Engine Starting Kick and electric starter Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced and Splash
Clutch DS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Air-Cooled
Maximum Power -- 10 HP @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 8.5 NM @ 7500 RPM
Seating Capacity 1 2
Transmission 6-speed Chain
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Display -- Classic Design with round meters
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Type : Cradle / Steel
Headlamp -- Round headlight
Tyres
Front -- 2.75-18
Rear -- 3.50-16
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front Disc brake 260 mm Mechanical Drum
Rear Disc brake 220 mm Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm Telescopic
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2000 mm
Width -- 820 mm
Height -- 1090 mm
Weight 99.6 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 120
Seat Height 950 --
Wheelbase -- 1320 mm
Ground Clearance 360 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 12.0 litres
Overview
Features - Ultra lightweight punch
- Composite carbon fibre subframe
- Integrated cooling and radiators
- Hydraulic brakes
- Hydraulic clutch
- Bodywork
- CNC machined triple clamp
- Electric start and wiring harness
- Engine management system
- Single 2-step Seat provides a comfortable ride for the rider and passenger
- Tested and Improved Engine Components for tough using conditions
- Study frame design and low Fuel Consumption
Additional Details EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7706