Husqvarna 2023 TE 250 vs Yamaha 2020 WR250R

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 2023 TE 250 and Yamaha 2020 WR250R

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 2023 TE 250
Husqvarna 2023 TE 250

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2020 WR250R
Yamaha 2020 WR250R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 250.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine liquid-cooled DOHC 4-stroke; 4 valves
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Clutch DDS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Ignition -- TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Seating Capacity 1 --
Transmission 6-speed Constant-mesh 6-speed, multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 80/100-21
Rear -- 120/80-18
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc brake 260 mm Hydraulic single disc, 250mm
Rear Disc brake 220 mm Hydraulic single disc, 230mm
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm Inverted fork, fully adjustable; 10.6-in travel
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Single shock, fully adjustable; 10.6-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2174 mm
Width -- 810 mm
Height -- 1229 mm
Weight 106.2 kg 133.81 kg
Seat Height 950 929
Wheelbase -- 1419 mm
Ground Clearance 360 mm 299 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 7.57 litres
Overview
Features - Ultra lightweight punch
- Composite carbon fibre subframe
- Integrated cooling and radiators
- Hydraulic brakes
- Hydraulic clutch
- Bodywork
- CNC machined triple clamp
- Electric start and wiring harness
- Engine management system
- YZ-F Developed Dual-Sport
- Dirt-Focused Performance
- Advanced Fuel-Injected Engine
- Full-Adjustable Suspension
- Narrow, Rider-Focused Ergonomics
- Racing-Derived Saddle
- High-Visibility Lighting
Additional Details EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8233