Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022 vs Kawasaki Ninja 650

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022 and Kawasaki Ninja 650

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022
Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Ninja 650
Kawasaki Ninja 650

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 692.70 cc 649.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps --
Clutch APTC(TM) slipper clutch, hydraulically actuated --
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 73.7 PS 68 PS @ 8000 mm
Maximum Torque -- 66.7 Nm
Seating Capacity 1 --
Transmission 6-speed --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Display Digital --
Frame Chromium-Molybdenum steel trellis frame, powder coated --
Headlamp Bulb --
Tyres
Front -- 120 / 70ZR17M / C (58W)
Rear -- 160 / 60ZR17M / C (69W)
Wheel / RIM Spoke Alloy
Brakes
Front Brembo four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc 320 mm Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs
Rear Brembo single-piston floating calliper, brake disc 230 mm Single 220 mm petal disc
ABS Two-channel Bosch 9.1 MP ABS (incl. Cornering ABS and Supermoto mode Disengegable) --
Suspension
Front WP APEX 48 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear WP APEX with Pro-Lever linkage Horizontal Back-link with adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2055 mm
Width -- 740 mm
Height -- 1135 mm
Weight 147 kg 194 kg
Seat Height 890 --
Wheelbase -- 1410 mm
Ground Clearance 238 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres --
Overview
Features - Polyamide rear subframe and tank
- Ride Modes
- Traction control
- CNC-machined triple clamps
- Slipper clutch
- A2 license compatible
--
Additional Details Co2 Emissions: 94 G/Km
Ems: Keihin Ems With Rbw, Twin Ignition
Fuel Consumption: 4.05 L/100 Km
Steering Head Angle: 63.6 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 215 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 240 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4423