Husqvarna Brutale 1000 RS vs Yamaha Bolt

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna Brutale 1000 RS and Yamaha Bolt

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna Brutale 1000 RS
Husqvarna Brutale 1000 RS

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Bolt
Yamaha Bolt

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 998.00 cc 942.00 cc
Engine Four cylinder, 4 stroke, 16 valve,“D.O.H.C”, radial valve and DLC tappet Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC 4-valve, V-twin
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Wet, multi-disc with back torque limiting device and Brembo radial pump/lever assembly --
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Cooling with separated liquid and oil radiators Air Cooled
Maximum Power 208 PS @ 13000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 116.5 NM @ 11000 RPM --
Transmission Cassette style; six speed, constant mesh Constant mesh 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Primary drive : 48/82
First gear: Speed : 14/37
Second gear: Speed : 16/33
Third gear: Speed : 18/31
Fourth gear: Speed : 20/30
Fifth gear: Speed : 22/29
Sixth gear: Speed : 21/25
Final drive ratio : 15/41
--
Top Speed 300 kmph --
Battery Li-ion 12 V - 4.0 Ah --
Display Dashboard TFT 5.5” color display --
Frame CrMo Steel tubular trellis Double cradle
Tyres
Front 120/70 - ZR 17 M/C (58 W) 100/90-19M/C 57H Tubeless
Rear 200/55 - ZR 17 M/C (78 W) 150/80B16M/C 71H Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Front wheel: Material/size : Aluminium alloy 3,50” x 17”
Rear wheel: Material/size : Aluminium alloy 6,00” x 17”
Alloy
Brakes
Front 320 mm Double floating disc with steel braking disc and aluminium flange - Brembo radial pump/level assembly
Front brake caliper : Brembo Stylema radial-type, single-piece with 4 pistons Ø 30 mm (Ø 1.18 in.)
298 mm Hydraulic single disc
Rear 220 mm Single steel disc with Brembo PS13 brake pump
Rear brake caliper : Brembo with 2 pistons Ø 34 mm (Ø 1.34 in.)
298 mm Hydraulic single disc
ABS Continental MK100 with RLM (Rear Wheel Lift-up Mitigation) and with cornering function --
Suspension
Front 50 mm Marzocchi “UPSIDE - DOWN” telescopic hydraulic fork with adjustable rebound-compression damping and external spring preload.
Fork travel :
Telescopic forks, 120 mm travel
Rear Progressive Sachs, single shock absorber with rebound and compression (High speed/Low speed) damping and spring preload adjustment Swingarm, 70 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors AGO RED/MATT METALLIC DARK GREY
MAGNUM SILVER/MATT METALLIC DARK GREY
--


Physical Specs
Length 2080 mm 2290 mm
Width 805 mm 830 mm
Height -- 1120 mm
Weight -- 247 kg
Kerb Weight 186 --
Seat Height 845 --
Wheelbase 1415 mm 1570 mm
Ground Clearance 141 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 12 litres
Overview
Features - Light crankshaft
- New combustion chamber Titanium connecting rods
- Dashboard TFT 5.5” color display
- Cruise control
- Bluetooth GPS MV Ride App for navigation mirroring, app
- Controlled engine, suspension and rider aids setup
- Launch Control FLC Front lift control Mobisat tracker
--
Additional Details Engine management system : integrated ignition - injection system MVICS 2.1 (Motor & Vehicle Integrated Control System) with eight injectors (4 lower fuel injectors by Mikuni + 4 upper fuel injectors by Magneti Marelli with increased fuel flow). Engine control unit Eldor Nemo 2.1, throttle body bore 50 mm diameters full ride by wire Mikuni, pencil-coil with ion-sensing technology, control of detonation and misfire Torque control with four maps. Traction control with 8 levels + off and wheelie control with inertial platform.
Electronic quick-shift : MV EAS 3.0 (Electronically Assisted Shift Up & Down)
Rear swing arm pivot plates material : Aluminium alloy - Adjustable swingarm pivot height
Voltage : 12 V
Alternator : 350 W at 5.000 r.p.m
Single sided swing arm material : Aluminium alloy
Wheel travel : 120 mm (4.72 in.)
Fairing material : Thermoplastic
Steering damper : Öhlins EC with electronic manual and automatic adjustment modes
Trail : 97 mm (3.82 in.)
Environmental Standard : Euro 5
Combined fuel consumption : 6.8 l/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 158 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1695