Husqvarna Norden 901 Expedition 2023 vs MV Agusta Brutale 800 RR SCS

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Husqvarna Norden 901 Expedition 2023 vs MV Agusta Brutale 800 RR SCS

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna Norden 901 Expedition 2023 and MV Agusta Brutale 800 RR SCS

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna Norden 901 Expedition 2023 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

MV Agusta Brutale 800 RR SCS Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	889.00 cc	798.00 cc
Engine	2-cylinder, 4-stroke, parallel twin	Three cylinder, 4 stroke, 12 valve, “D.O.H.C” with mechanical chain tensioner
Engine Starting	Electric	Electric
Engine Lubrication	Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps	--
Clutch	PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated	S.C.S. 2.0 (Smart Clutch System) Radius CX automatic clutch with hydraulic clutch actuation, wet multi-disc
Ignition	--	Integrated ignition - injection system MVICS 2.0 (Motor & Vehicle Integrated Control System) with six injectors.
Cooling System	Liquid cooled with water/oil heat exchanger	Cooling with separeted liquid and oil radiators
Maximum Power	103 PS	140 PS @ 12.300 RPM
Maximum Torque	--	87 NM @ 10.100 RPM
Transmission	6-speed	Cassette style; six speed, constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern	1-N-2-3-4-5-6	1-N-2-3-4--5-6
Battery	--	12 V - 8.5 Ah
Display	TFT Display	--
Frame	Chromium-Molybdenum-Steel frame using the engine as stressed element, powder coated	ALS Steel tubular trellis
Chain	520 X-Ring	--
Headlamp	LED	--
Taillamp	LED	--

Fuel Economy

Overall Mileage

22 kmpl

--

Tyres

Front	irelli Scorpion Rally STR tyre	120/70 - ZR 17 M/C (58 W)
Rear	irelli Scorpion Rally STR tyre	180/55 - ZR 17 M/C (73 W
Wheel / RIM	Spoke	Front: Material/size Aluminium alloy 3.50 ” x 17 ” Rear: Material/size Aluminium alloy 5.50 ” x 17 ”

Brakes

Front	320 mm 2x radially mounted 4 piston caliper disc brake	Double floating disc with Ø 320 mm (Ø 12.6 in.) diameter, with steel braking disc and flange
Rear	260 mm 2 piston floating caliper disc brake	Single steel disc with Ø 220 mm (Ø 8.66 in.) dia.
ABS	Bosch 9.1 MP (incl. Cornering-ABS and offroad mode, disengageable)	Bosch 9 Plus with RLM (Rear wheel Lift-up Mitigation)

Suspension

Front	WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm Travel: 240 mm	Marzocchi “UPSIDE DOWN” aluminium telescopic hydraulic fork with DLC treatment , with anodized fork legs and having rebound-compression damping and spring preload external and separate adjustment
Rear	WP Xplor PDS shock absorber Travel: 240 mm	Progressive Sachs, single shock absorber with rebound and compression damping and spring preload adjustment

Colors Available

Colors

--

SHOCK PEARL RED / AVIO GREY AVIO SILVER / DARK METALLIC GREY

Physical Specs

Length	--	2045 mm
Width	--	875 mm
Kerb Weight	214.5	175
Seat Height	--	830
Wheelbase	--	1400 mm
Ground Clearance	270 mm	135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	19 litres	16.5 litres

Overview

About	Husqvarna has recently launched its new adventure-touring motorcycle, the Norden 901 Expedition Read More	--
Features	- TFT Display - Off road ABS - Cruise Control - MTC - Easy shift - Ride modes - Touring Windshield - Offroad wheels LED Lights Touring Windshield TFT Display	- Smart Clutch System
Additional Details	CO2 EMISSIONS: 105 g/km FUEL CONSUMPTION: 4.5 l/100 km	Engine management system : Engine control unit Eldor EM2.0, throttle body full ride by wire Mikuni, pencil-coil with ion-sensing technology, control of detonation and misfire. Torque control with four maps, Traction Control with eight levels of intervention with lean angle sensor. Electronic quick-shift : MV EAS 2.1 (Electronically Assisted Shift up & down Primary drive 22/41 Gear ratio : First gear: 13/37 Second gear: 16/34 Third gear: 18/32 Fourth gear: 19/30 Fifth gear: 21/30 Sixth gear: 22/29 Final drive ratio : 16/41 Trail : 103.5 mm Front Fork : 43 mm (1.69 in.) Fork travel : 125 mm (4.92 in.) Rear Wheel travel : 124 mm (4.88 in.) Parking brake : Integrated in the rear hydraulic brake system Environmental Standard : Euro 4 Combined fuel consumption : 6.7 l/100 km CO2 Emissions : 163 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

5313