Husqvarna TE 300i vs Kawasaki 2023 KLX300R

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna TE 300i and Kawasaki 2023 KLX300R

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna TE 300i
Husqvarna TE 300i

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki 2023 KLX300R
Kawasaki 2023 KLX300R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 293.20 cc 292.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine 4-stroke single, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics Wet multi-disc manual clutch
Fuel System -- DFI® with 34mm Keihin throttle body
Ignition -- TCBI Electronic Advance
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Climbing Degree 63.5 ° --
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed, return shift
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final Drive : Chain
Battery Li-Ion battery --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Tubular, Semi-Double Cradle
Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Tyres
Front -- 80/100-21
Rear -- 100/100-18
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc brake Single 270mm petal disc with a dual-piston caliper
Rear 220 mm Disc brake Single 240mm petal disc with single-piston caliper
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm 43mm inverted telescopic fork with adjustable compression damping /11.2 in
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Uni-Trak® gas charged shock with piggyback reservoir with adjustable compression, rebound damping and spring preload/11.2 in
Colors Available
Colors -- Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length -- 2121 mm
Width -- 825 mm
Height -- 1250 mm
Weight 106.2 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 128
Seat Height 950 924
Wheelbase -- 1435 mm
Ground Clearance -- 305 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8.5 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features -- - Full-size wheels
- Powerful petal disc brakes front and rear
- KX™-inspired styling and ergonomics
- ERGO-FIT® adjustability with 4-way handlebar positions
- Powerful Engine
- Nimble Chassis
- Long - Travel Suspension
Additional Details CO2 Emissions : 64.5 g/km
EMS : AET digital
Fuel Consumption : 2.79 l/100 km
Rake/Trail : 26.9°/4.3 in

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7866