Husqvarna TX 300 Heritage vs Sherco 300 ST-R

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna TX 300 Heritage and Sherco 300 ST-R

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna TX 300 Heritage
Husqvarna TX 300 Heritage

Brand:

Model:

Sherco 300 ST-R
Sherco 300 ST-R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 293.20 cc 294.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine 2 stroke Sherco proprietary design
Engine Starting Electric starter Geared system with folding lever
Engine Lubrication -- 2% oil pre-mix
Clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics Hydraulic, diaphragm system
Ignition -- Hidria digital
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Transmission 6-speed 5 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Tubular section Chrome-moly
Chain 5/8 x 1/4" --
Tyres
Front -- Morad 21” black rim
Rear -- Morad 18” black rim
Wheel / RIM Alloy Rims Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc brake
Front Brake Disc Diameter : 260 mm
185 mm Hydraulically activated, floating
Rear Disc brake
Rear brake Disc Diameter : 220 mm
--
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm
Suspension Travel : 310 mm
39 mm Steel Tech fork
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
175 mm Progressive link system with single adjustable shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 100.3 kg --
Seat Height 948 --
Wheelbase -- 1322 mm
Ground Clearance 354 mm 310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8.5 litres 2.4 litres
Overview
Features - Faster and Wiser
- Ride Easier
- Polyamide Reinforced aluminum subframe
- Triple Clamps
- Effortless ergonomics
- Technologically advanced
- EFI
- E-Start
- Map Switch
- EMS
- Hour meter
- Start/Stop Switch
- Cylinder head: improved compression rate and dome-shaped head
- Crankshaft: new balancing, reduced vibration, more torque in the mid-range and at high revs
- New CDI curve: increased power at low rpms
- Removable rear exhaust bracket
- R16v shock absorber
Additional Details EMS : Vitesco Technologies EMS
Steering Head Angle : 62.9 °
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3974