Kawasaki J125 vs Mash Sixty 125

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki J125 and Mash Sixty 125

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki J125
Kawasaki J125

Brand:

Model:

Mash Sixty 125
Mash Sixty 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.60 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Single,SOHC, 4 valves SOHC, Air-Cooled
Engine Starting Electric Electric or Kick
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 27 mm x 1 Electronic Delphi
Ignition ECU Control (Full transistor) Electronic
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 13 PS @ 8500 RPM 5.3 HP @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 10.9 NM @ 7750 RPM --
Transmission CVT with centrifugal clutch Automatic Drive
Frame Tubular diamond, steel --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/80-14 M/C 58S 3.50 - 10
Rear 150/70-13 M/C 64S 3.50 - 10
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Single 260 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual Piston Disc
Rear Single 240 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual Piston --
Suspension
Front 37 mm telescopic fork Telescopic
Rear Twin shocks with 5-way adjustable preload --
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Flat Anthracite Black / Candy Flat Blazed Green Black
Silver Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2235 mm 1885 mm
Width 800 mm 770 mm
Height 1285 mm 1090 mm
Weight -- 99 kg
Kerb Weight 182 --
Seat Height 775 750
Wheelbase 1555 mm --
Ground Clearance 145 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 4.6 litres
Overview
About Introducing the Kawasaki J125, a sleek and stylish scooter that boasts an array of impressive f Read More --
Features - ABS available
- Multi-function LCD panel
- Anti-tamper, Anti-theft Ignition Switch
- Handy Glove Box
- Sporty & comfortable suspension settings
- Under-seat storage
- Led Taillight
- Adjustable brake levers
- Curved floorboard
- 14” front, 13” rear wheels

Kawasaki J125
Multi-function LCD panel
--
Additional Details Trail : 113 mm
Wheel travel front : 110 mm
Wheel travel rear : 100 mm
Final drive : Belt
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.201 ~ 0.829
CO2 emission : 70 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1544