Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance vs Mash Five Hundred 400

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance and Mash Five Hundred 400

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Mash Five Hundred 400
Mash Five Hundred 400

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 397.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves 4 Stroke, dry sump SOHC, 4 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric or Kick
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual --
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 Electronic Delphi
Ignition -- electronic
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 45 PS @ 10000 RPM 27 HP @ 7000 RPM
Maximum Torque 38 NM @ 8000 RPM 29.91 NM @ 5500 RPM
Transmission 6-speed --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame Trellis, high-tensile steel --
Tyres
Front 110/70R17 M/C 54H 100/90-19
Rear 150/60R17 M/C 66H 130/70-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Single semi-floating 310 mm petal discs. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston 280 mm Disc
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual-piston 160 mm Drum
ABS -- ABS Disconnectable Brake System
Suspension
Front 41mm telescopic fork 41 mm Hydraulic Fork
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload --
Colors Available
Colors Lime green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Metallic Spark Black / Lime Green
Brown
Silver
Irish Green


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm 2105 mm
Width 710 mm 760 mm
Height 1120 mm 1130 mm
Weight -- 151 kg
Kerb Weight 168 --
Seat Height 785 780
Wheelbase 1370 mm --
Ground Clearance 140 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 13 litres
Overview
Features - Akrapovic Sports Exhaust --
Additional Details Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.219 (71/32)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.929 (41/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.056 (37/18)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.619 (34/21)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.154 (30/26)
Gear Ratios 6th : 1.037 (28/27)
Final reduction ratio : 2.929 (41/14)
CO2 emission : 100 g/km
Trail : 92 mm
Wheel travel front : 120 mm
Wheel travel rear : 130 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5322