Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance vs Mash Scrambler 400

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance vs Mash Scrambler 400

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance and Mash Scrambler 400

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Mash Scrambler 400 Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	399.00 cc	397.00 cc
Engine	Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves	SOHC
Engine Starting	Electric	Electric or Kick
Engine Lubrication	Forced lubrication, wet sump	--
Clutch	Wet multi-disc, manual	--
Fuel System	Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2	Electronic Delphi
Ignition	--	electronic
Cooling System	Liquid-cooled	Air-Cooled
Maximum Power	45 PS @ 10000 RPM	27.6 HP @ 7000 RPM
Maximum Torque	38 NM @ 8000 RPM	29.91 NM @ 5500 RPM 
Transmission	6-speed	--
Gear Shift Pattern	1-N-2-3-4-5-6	--
Frame	Trellis, high-tensile steel	--

Tyres

Front	110/70R17 M/C 54H	110/90-19
Rear	150/60R17 M/C 66H	130/70-18
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	Spoke

Brakes

Front	Single semi-floating 310 mm petal discs. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston	280 mm Disk
Rear	Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual-piston	160 mm Drum
ABS	--	ABS Disconnectable

Suspension

Front	41mm telescopic fork	35 mm Hydraulic Fork
Rear	Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload	--

Colors Available

Colors

Lime green / Ebony (KRT Edition) Metallic Spark Black / Lime Green

Silver Black Red

Physical Specs

Length	1990 mm	2130 mm
Width	710 mm	800 mm
Height	1120 mm	1130 mm
Weight	--	151 kg
Kerb Weight	168	--
Seat Height	785	780
Wheelbase	1370 mm	--
Ground Clearance	140 mm	--
Fuel Tank Capacity	14 litres	13 litres

Overview

Features	- Akrapovic Sports Exhaust	--
Additional Details	Final drive : Sealed chain Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.219 (71/32) Gear Ratios 1st : 2.929 (41/14) Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.056 (37/18) Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.619 (34/21) Gear Ratios 4th : 1.333 (32/24) Gear Ratios 5th : 1.154 (30/26) Gear Ratios 6th : 1.037 (28/27) Final reduction ratio : 2.929 (41/14) CO2 emission : 100 g/km Trail : 92 mm Wheel travel front : 120 mm Wheel travel rear : 130 mm	Emission Standards : EURO4

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

4698