Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance vs Mash TT40 Cafe Racer 400

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance and Mash TT40 Cafe Racer 400

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Mash TT40 Cafe Racer 400
Mash TT40 Cafe Racer 400

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 397.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves 4 Stroke, dry sump SOHC, 4 valves, Air-Cooled
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual --
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 Electronic Delphi
Ignition -- Electronic
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 45 PS @ 10000 RPM 27.6 HP @ 7000 RPM
Maximum Torque 38 NM @ 8000 RPM 29.91 NM @ 5500 RPM
Transmission 6-speed --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame Trellis, high-tensile steel --
Tyres
Front 110/70R17 M/C 54H 3.25-18
Rear 150/60R17 M/C 66H 130/80-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Single semi-floating 310 mm petal discs. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston 320 mm Disc,4 pistons brake caliper inox braided hose
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual-piston 240 mm Disc, Double pistons brake caliper inox braided hose
ABS -- ABS Hydraulic brake system disconnectable
Suspension
Front 41mm telescopic fork 41 mm Hydraulic Fork
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload --
Colors Available
Colors Lime green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Metallic Spark Black / Lime Green
Silver Grey
Candy Red


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm 2100 mm
Width 710 mm 730 mm
Height 1120 mm 1230 mm
Weight -- 167 kg
Kerb Weight 168 --
Seat Height 785 800
Wheelbase 1370 mm --
Ground Clearance 140 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features - Akrapovic Sports Exhaust --
Additional Details Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.219 (71/32)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.929 (41/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.056 (37/18)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.619 (34/21)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.154 (30/26)
Gear Ratios 6th : 1.037 (28/27)
Final reduction ratio : 2.929 (41/14)
CO2 emission : 100 g/km
Trail : 92 mm
Wheel travel front : 120 mm
Wheel travel rear : 130 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

7644 Enter the numbers here: