Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	649.00 cc	689.00 cc
Engine	Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin	Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Fuel System	--	Fuel injection
Cooling System	Liquid cooled	--
Maximum Power	68 PS @ 8000 mm	--
Transmission	--	6-speed; multiplate wet clutch; with Assist & Slipper clutch
Drivetrain	--	Final Drive: Chain

Tyres

Front	120 / 70ZR17M / C (58W)	120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22F
Rear	160 / 60ZR17M / C (69W)	180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22R
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	--

Brakes

Front	Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs	298mm dual disc hydraulic with ABS
Rear	Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs	245mm disc hydraulic with ABS

Suspension

Front	41 mm telescopic fork	Telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel, adjustable for preload, rebound and compression
Rear	Horizontal Back-link with adjustable preload	Linked-type Monocross shock, adjustable preload and rebound; 5.1-in travel

Colors Available

Colors

--

Heritage White/Redline

Physical Specs

Length	2055 mm	2070 mm
Width	740 mm	706 mm
Height	1135 mm	1160 mm
Weight	194 kg	--
Seat Height	--	835
Wheelbase	1410 mm	1394 mm
Ground Clearance	130 mm	134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	--	13 litres

Overview

Features	--	Digital LCD Instrumentation Linear Torque with Smooth Acceleration Quick Shift System for Smooth Upshifts Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Additional Details	--	Rake (Caster Angle): 23.7° Trail: 3.5 in Fuel Economy: 58 MPG Wet Weight: 414 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

8079