Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE vs Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE and Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE
Kawasaki Ninja 650 SE

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)
Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.00 cc 600.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC , Inline, 4-cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 68 PS @ 8000 mm 57.0 kW @ 10000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 59.7 NM @ 8500 RPM
Transmission -- Constant mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Chain
Battery -- 12 V, 10.0 Ah
Frame -- Diamond shape
Gear -- Gear ratio 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th/6th : 2.846 (37/13), 1.947 (37/19), 1.556(28/18), 1.333 (32/24), 1.190 (25/21), 1.083 (26/24)
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120 / 70ZR17M / C (58W) 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) tubeless
Rear 160 / 60ZR17M / C (69W) 160/60 ZR17M/C (69W) tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front wheel travel : 130 mm
Rear wheel travel : 130 mm
Brakes
Front Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs 298 mm Dual disc Brake
Rear Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs 245 mm Single disc Brake
Suspension
Front 41 mm telescopic fork Telescopic forks
Rear Horizontal Back-link with adjustable preload Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2120 mm
Width 740 mm 800 mm
Height 1135 mm 1285 mm
Weight 194 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 241
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1410 mm 1440 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Siren & speaker
- Document box
- Side cases (Photo)
- Engine guard
- Anti-lock brake system (ABS)
- High windshield
- Raised handlebars
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 3.4 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 1.955 (86/44)
Secondary reduction ratio : 2.875 (46/16)
Caster angle : 26°
Trail : 103 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7820