Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 650 and Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 650
Kawasaki Ninja 650

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)
Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.00 cc 600.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC , Inline, 4-cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 68 PS @ 8000 mm 57.0 kW @ 10000 RPM
Maximum Torque 66.7 Nm 59.7 NM @ 8500 RPM
Transmission -- Constant mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Chain
Battery -- 12 V, 10.0 Ah
Frame -- Diamond shape
Gear -- Gear ratio 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th/6th : 2.846 (37/13), 1.947 (37/19), 1.556(28/18), 1.333 (32/24), 1.190 (25/21), 1.083 (26/24)
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120 / 70ZR17M / C (58W) 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) tubeless
Rear 160 / 60ZR17M / C (69W) 160/60 ZR17M/C (69W) tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front wheel travel : 130 mm
Rear wheel travel : 130 mm
Brakes
Front Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs 298 mm Dual disc Brake
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc 245 mm Single disc Brake
Suspension
Front 41 mm telescopic fork Telescopic forks
Rear Horizontal Back-link with adjustable preload Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2120 mm
Width 740 mm 800 mm
Height 1135 mm 1285 mm
Weight 194 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 241
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1410 mm 1440 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Siren & speaker
- Document box
- Side cases (Photo)
- Engine guard
- Anti-lock brake system (ABS)
- High windshield
- Raised handlebars
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 3.4 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 1.955 (86/44)
Secondary reduction ratio : 2.875 (46/16)
Caster angle : 26°
Trail : 103 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8950