Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban vs Qianjiang QJ250-3

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban and Qianjiang QJ250-3

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Brand:

Model:

Qianjiang QJ250-3
Qianjiang QJ250-3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 296.00 cc 252.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves 4-Stroke, Inline 2-Cylinder,SOHC 4V
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump Forced and Splash
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Oil-Cooled
Maximum Power 40 PS @ 11500 RPM 13 HP @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM 16.5 NM @ 6000 RPM
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 6-speed Chain
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame -- Cradle / Steel
Tyres
Front 100/90-19M/C 57S 90/90- 18 Tubeless
Rear 130/80-17M/C 65S 130/90- 15 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston 260 mm Hydraulic Disk
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston 130 mm Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front 41 mm telescopic fork 110 mm Telescopic
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload 50 mm Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Spark Black
Candy Lime Green
Red
Black
Green
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2170 mm 2180 mm
Width 860 mm 970 mm
Height 1390 mm 1180 mm
Kerb Weight 175 166
Seat Height -- 710
Wheelbase 1450 mm 1145 mm
Ground Clearance 180 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres --
Overview
Features - Topcase System 30 Litres --
Additional Details Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km
Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2126