Kawasaki Vulcan S Tourer 2022 vs Yamaha Tracer 700

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Vulcan S Tourer 2022 and Yamaha Tracer 700

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Vulcan S Tourer 2022
Kawasaki Vulcan S Tourer 2022

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tracer 700
Yamaha Tracer 700

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke Parallel Twin 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, semi‑dry sump Wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System Fuel injection: 38 mm x 2 with sub-throttles Fuel Injection
Ignition Digital TCI
Cooling System Liquid-cooled liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 61 PS @ 7500 RPM 72.4 PS @ 8750 RPM
Maximum Torque 62.4 NM @ 6600 RPM 68.0 NM @ 6500 RPM
Transmission 6-speed Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Final drive : Sealed chain --
Frame Tubular diamond, high-tensile steel Diamond
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70 R18M/C 59H 120/70 R17 M/C 58W (tubeless)
Rear 160/60 R17M/C 69H 180/55 R17 M/C 73W (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Single 300 mm disc. Caliper: Dual-piston Hydraulic dual disc, Ø282 mm
Rear Single 250 mm disc. Caliper: Single-piston Hydraulic single disc, Ø245 mm
Suspension
Front 41 mm telescopic fork
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Telescopic forks
Rear Offset laydown single-shock, linkage equipped, with 7-way adjustable preload
Wheel travel rear : 80 mm
Swingarm, (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Matte Graphenesteel Grey / Metallic Matte Graphite Grey
Candy Crimson Red
Metallic Flat Spark Black
Icon Grey
Sonic Grey
Phantom Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2310 mm 2140 mm
Width 880 mm 806 mm
Height 1100 mm 1290 mm
Weight -- 196 kg
Kerb Weight 229 --
Seat Height 705 840
Wheelbase 1575 mm 1460 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 17 litres
Overview
About The price for the Metallic Flat Spark Black variant is given and the price for the other vari Read More --
Features - Relaxed, foot-forward riding position
- Long wheelbase
- Comfortable seat
- Slim backbone-style rear frame
- Easy-to-control 649 cm3 liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin
- Linkage-equipped offset laydown single-shock
- Low seat height
- Adjustable footpegs
- Large disc brakes
- Easy-to-read instrumentation
- Under-engine muffler
- Modern, urban styling
- Long range
- ERGO-FIT
- ABS (Anti-lock Brake System)
- Dual Throttle Valves
- Economical Riding Indicator
- Twin LED projector headlights and position lamps
- Upgraded adjustable front and rear suspension
- Aerodynamic screen with single-handed adjustment
- Commanding riding position with comfortable ergonomics
- Contoured dual seat for rider and passenger comfort
- Long range autonomy
- Negative LCD display
Additional Details - Valve system : DOHC, 8 valves
- Limited power version : 35 kW
- CO2 emission : 102 g/km
- Power down kit 35 kW : Available
- Fuel consumption 35 kW kit : 4.5 l/100 km
- CO2 emission 35 kW kit : 104 g/km
- Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.095 (88 / 42)
- Gear Ratios 1st : 2.438 (39 / 16)
- Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.714 (36 / 21)
- Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.333 (32 / 24)
- Gear Ratios 4th : 1.111 (30 / 27)
- Gear Ratios 5th : 0.966 (28 / 29)
- Gear Ratios 6th : 0.852 (23 / 27)
- Final reduction ratio : 3.067 (46 / 15)
- Final reduction ratio : 3.067 (46 / 15)
- Trail : 120 mm
- Steering angle, left / right : 35o / 35o
Final transmission : Chain
Fuel consumption : 4.3l/100km
CO2 emission : 100g/km
Caster angle : 24.8º
Trail : 90mm
Front travel :130 mm
Rear travel : 142 mm
Oil tank capacity : 3.0L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3352