Kawasaki Z900RS Performance vs MV Agusta BRUTALE 1000 RR

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Z900RS Performance and MV Agusta BRUTALE 1000 RR

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Z900RS Performance
Kawasaki Z900RS Performance

Brand:

Model:

MV Agusta BRUTALE 1000 RR
MV Agusta BRUTALE 1000 RR

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 948.00 cc 998.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke In-Line Four,DOHC, 16 valves Four cylinder, 4 stroke, 16 valve,“D.O.H.C”, radial valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi-disc Wet, multi-disc with back torque limiting device and Brembo radial pump/lever assembly
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 36 mm x 4 with sub-throttle --
Ignition -- Integrated ignition - injection system MVICS (Motor & Vehicle Integrated Control System)
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Cooling with separated liquid and oil radiators
Maximum Power 111 PS @ 8500 RPM 208 PS @ 13000 RPM
Maximum Torque 98.5 NM @ 6500 RPM 1165 NM @ 11000 RPM
Transmission 6-speed Cassette style; six speed, constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed -- 300 kmph
Battery -- Li-ion 12 V - 4.0 Ah
Frame Trellis, high-tensile steel CrMo Steel tubular trellis
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17 M/C (58W) 120/70 - ZR 17 M/C (58 W)
Rear 180/55ZR17 M/C (73W) Rear 200/55 - ZR 17 M/C (78 W)
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front : Forged aluminium alloy 3,50 ” x 17 ”
Rear : Forged aluminium alloy 6,00 ” x 17 ”
Brakes
Front Dual semi-floating 300 mm discs. Caliper: Dual radial-mount, monobloc, opposed 4-piston Double floating disc with Ø 320 mm (Ø 12.6 in.) diameter, with steel braking disc and aluminium flange - Brembo radial pump/level assembly.
Rear Single 250 mm disc. Caliper: Single-piston Single steel disc with Ø 220 mm (Ø 8.66 in.) dia.- Brembo PS13 brake pump
ABS -- Bosch 9 Plus with Race Mode and RLM (Rear wheel Lift-up Mitigation)
Suspension
Front 41 mm inverted fork with compression and rebound damping and spring preload adjustability Öhlins Nix EC hydraulic “upside down” front forks with TiN superficial treatment.Completely adjustable with electronically controlled compression and rebound damping with manually controlled spring preload.
Fork dia. : 43 mm (1.69 in.)
Fork travel : 120 mm (4.72 in.)
Rear Horizontal Back-link, gas-charged shock with rebound damping and spring preload adjustability Progressive, single shock absorber Öhlins EC TTX completely adjustable with electronically controlled compression and rebound damping and spring preload
Colors Available
Colors New Metallic Green
Metallic Graphite Grey
Metallic Diablo Black
AGO RED / DARK METALLIC MATT GREY / MATT CARBON
METALLIC AVIO GRAY / FLUO YELLOW / DARK METALLIC MATT GREY / MATT CARBON


Physical Specs
Length 2100 mm 2080 mm
Width 865 mm 805 mm
Height 1150 mm --
Kerb Weight 215 186
Seat Height 835 845
Wheelbase 1470 mm 1415 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 141 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features -- - Light crankshaft
- New combustion chamber Titanium connecting rods
- Dashboard TFT 5”color display
- Cruise control - Bluetooth GPS
- App MVride for navigation mirroring,app-controlled engine, suspension and rider aids setup
- Launch Control
- FLC Front lift control
- Immobilizer
Additional Details Fuel consumption : 5.3 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 136 g/km
Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 1.627 (83/51)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.917 (35/12)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.059 (35/17)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.650 (33/20)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.222 (33/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.967 (29/30)
Primary drive : 48/82
Gear ratio:
First gear: Speed 14/37
Second gear: Speed 16/33
Third gear: Speed 18/31
Fourth gear: Speed 20/30
Fifth gear: Speed 22/29
Sixth gear: Speed 21/25
Final drive ratio : 16/41
Voltage : 12 V
Alternator : 350 W at 5000 r.p.m
Environmental Standard : Euro 4
Combined fuel consumption : 6.7 l/100 km CO2
Emissions : 153 g/km
Electronic quick-shift : MV EAS 2.1 (Electronically Assisted Shift Up & Down)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4820