Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5 vs Rose Pro Cross Ultegra

Compare Specifications of Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5 and Rose Pro Cross Ultegra

Selected Bikes

Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5
Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5

Brand:

Model:

Rose Pro Cross Ultegra
Rose Pro Cross Ultegra

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity Max Weight Allowed : 135Kg --
Frame Material : Alloy 6061 T6 ultra-light aluminium, triple butted, from approx. 1450 g Sand Black 64cm-28
Stem Leadtec LCS-7091 Ritchey 4-Axis WTD, +/-6°, black 120 mm
Handle Bar MTB-AL-174N ISO-C Ritchey Evo-Curve WCS blatte 44cm
Fork 27.5 inch Kettler fork High Performance Disc, 1 1/8" - 1.5", full carbon Sand Black
Seatpost Kalloy SP-C297 Ritchey 2B, 350mm, WTD, black 27,2 mm
Crankset Lasco RCK1130TCG16 Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 50/34 175 mm
Pedals Fasten NW-450 --
Chain -- Shimano CN-HG601, 118 links
Shifters Shimano Altus SL-M315 --
Saddle Vader LWS(N5)-5 Selle Italia X3 Flow black/black
Derailleur Front 9 speed derailleur gears --
Derailleur Rear 9 speed derailleur gears --
Hub Front KT-Ayer --
Hub Rear KT-A15F --
Spoke Spoke 2.0 --
Cassette -- Shimano 105 CS-R7000, 11-34
Tyres
Front 27,5 x 2.00, Vee Rubber Speedtser Schwalbe X-ONE Allround Evo 700x33c black 700 x 33C
Rear 27,5 x 2.00, Vee Rubber Speedtser Schwalbe X-ONE Allround Evo 700x33c black 700 x 33C
Wheel / RIM 27,5 inch, Aluminium MAVIC Crossride FTS-X 28"/ 29"
Brakes
Front V-Brake, Lee Chi TX-122 Shimano Ultegra ST-R8020 / BR-R8070 / SMRT66 160 mm
Rear V-Brake, Lee Chi TX-122 Shimano Ultegra ST-R8020 / BR-R8070 / SMRT66 160 mm
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Silver shiny Matt Black/Grey
Sand Black


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 9.0 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Frame Size : 38Cm, 44Cm Front Mech : Shimano Ultegra FD-R8000
Rear Mech : Shimano Ultegra RD-RX800 GS
Spacers : ROSE aluminium spacers (+tapered 5 mm spacer) black 30 mm (2x5 mm, 2x10 mm)
Handlebar Tape : Giusti Velvet black

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8798