Kona Process 165 vs Trinx X8 Elite

Compare Specifications of Kona Process 165 and Trinx X8 Elite

Selected Bikes

Kona Process 165
Kona Process 165

Brand:

Model:

Trinx X8 Elite
Trinx X8 Elite

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Kona 6061 Aluminum Butted 165 mm Travel Trinx Alloy Tri-Butted Smooth Welding 27.5"*16"/18"
Stem Kona XC/BC 35 Trinx Alloy
Handle Bar Kona XC/BC 35 Trinx Alloy
Fork RockShox Yari Charger RC DebonAir 170 mm Tapered 110 mm Spacing Magnesium AIR Remote Suspension,Travel :100 mm
Seats Seat Clamp : Kona Clamp --
Seatpost 31.6 mm KS Lev Integra with Southpaw Lever Trinx Alloy
Grip Kona Key Grip --
Crankset SRAM NX Eagle DUB --
Chain SRAM NX-Eagle KMC 12S
Shifters SRAM NX-Eagle Shimano Deore M6100
Saddle WTB Volt Comp (Comp 250 size S) SR Sport
Headset FSA Orbit 1.5 E ZS --
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Deore M6100
Hub Front 148 x 12 mm Formula Formula Alloy Double Sealed Bearing
Hub Rear 110 x 15 mm Formula Formula Alloy Double Sealed Bearing
Spoke Stainless Black 14 g --
Cassette -- CS-M9012,Cassette,11-50T
Chainrings 34 t X-Sync Eagle Prowheel 36T 12S
Tyres
Front Maxxis DHF 2.5 WT TR/3C/Double Down CST 27.5"x 2.10" 60TPI
Rear Maxxis DHF 2.3 TR/3C/Double Down CST 27.5"x 2.10" 60TPI
Wheel / RIM WTB KOM Trail TCS rims
Free Wheel : SRAM NX-Eagle 11-50 t 12spd
Rim:Alloy,Double Walls
Brakes
Front 200 mm SRAM Code R 4-piston, SRAM Centerline Shimano BR-MT200 Hydraulic Disc
Rear 200 mm Rear Rotor, SRAM Centerline Shimano BR-MT200 Hydraulic Disc
Brake Lever SRAM Code R --
Suspension
Front 170 mm --
Rear 165 mm
Rear Shock : RockShox Super Deluxe Coil R
--
Colors Available
Colors Matt Warm Gray with Slate Blue
Yellow
Black Decals
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features - Internal Headset
- Tapered Head Tube
- 12 x 148 mm AXLE
- Tubeless Compatible Rims
- Beamer Independent Suspension
--
Additional Details Drivetrain : SRAM NX Eagle 12spd
Cockpit : Kona 35 mm Bar/Stem with Kona Lock-on Key Grip
Bottom Bracket : SRAM DUB PF92
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9148