Kona Unit vs Kreidler Stack 6.0 Sports

Compare Specifications of Kona Unit and Kreidler Stack 6.0 Sports

Selected Bikes

Kona Unit
Kona Unit

Brand:

Model:

Kreidler Stack 6.0 Sports
Kreidler Stack 6.0 Sports

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- Perm. Total weight : 120 kg
Frame Reynolds 520 Butted Cromoly Aluminum 6061, 28 "trekking
Stem Kona XC/BC Sonos, 31.8mm, 4-way clamping
Handle Bar Kona XC/BC Riser Sonos aluminum riser bar, 9 °, 700 mm
Fork Kona Plus Fork 110 mm spacing 28 "aluminum fork, aluminum
Seats Seat Clamp : Kona Clamp --
Seatpost 31.6 mm Kona Thumb with Offset Sonos, patent, aluminum, 31.6 mm, 400 mm
Grip Kona Key Grip --
Crankset FSA Comet Modular Shimano Claris, 50/34 teeth
Pedals Kona JS2 Flat, plastic
Chain KMC Z1 Narrow KMC X8
Saddle WTB Volt Sport (Sport 250 size S) Sonos trekking
Headset TH ZST No.10 --
Derailleur Front -- Shimano Claris
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Claris
Hub Front 148 x 12 mm Formula Parallax, disc, aluminum
Hub Rear 110 x 15 mm Formula Parallax, disc, aluminum
Spoke Stainless Black 14 g Mach1
Chainrings 32 t --
Bottom Bracket -- Shimano SM-BB52
Tyres
Front 29 x 2.6 WTB Ranger TCS Schwalbe Cross CX Comp 40-622
Rear 29 x 2.6 WTB Ranger TCS Schwalbe Cross CX Comp 40-622
Wheel / RIM WTB ST i30 TCS 29
Free Wheel : Joytech 18 t
Schurmann YAK19
Brakes
Front 180 mm Tektro HDM275, Tektro TR180 Tektro HD-M275 160 mm disc brake
Rear 160 mm Rear Rotor, Tektro TR160 Tektro HD-M275 160 mm disc brake
Brake Lever Tektro HDM275 --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Matt Black with Sage
Charcoal Decals
Black Matt


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 11.9 kg
Overview
Features - Internal Headset
- 44 mm Head Tube
- Tubeless Compatible Rims
- 12 x 148 mm AXLE
--
Additional Details Drivetrain : Single Speed
Cockpit : Kona XC/BC Riser Bar/Kona XC/BC Stem with Kona Lock-on Key Grip
Tax Rate : FSA 1 1/8 "a-head
Handles : Herrmans 89B
Gear Lever : Shimano Claris
Ring Gear : Shimano Claris, 11-34 teeth
Gear ratio (front : rear) : 50/34 teeth : 11-34 teeth

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7678