Kross Hexagon Boost 3.0 500 vs Super73 S1

Compare Specifications of Kross Hexagon Boost 3.0 500 and Super73 S1

Selected Bikes

Kross Hexagon Boost 3.0 500
Kross Hexagon Boost 3.0 500

Brand:

Model:

Super73 S1
Super73 S1

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor -- Class-2 500 watts nominal/1000 peak
Charging Time -- 2A (6-7 hour charge time) / Optional: 5A (3-4 hour charge time)
Engine TRUCKRUN M1, 250W --
Load Carrying Capacity -- 275lbs
Top Speed -- 32 kmph
Speed 8 --
Riding Modes -- 3 modes (ECO, MID, HIGH)
3 modes (ECO, MID, HIGH)
Battery KANGAROO 501WH 768 watt-hours, 18650 cells
Charger -- 2A (6-7 hour charge time) / Optional: 5A (3-4 hour charge time)
Display TRUCKRUN M1 LCD Display
Frame ALUMINUM LITE Steel
Stem ALUMINIUM 60 MM --
Handle Bar ALUMINIUM 720 MM --
Fork SR SUNTOUR XCM DS --
Seats -- Standard short seat
Grip KROSS SCALE --
Crankset TRUCKRUN M1 140mm alloy crank arms, 36T chainring
Pedals FP-906 --
Chain KMC X8 --
Shifters SHIMANO M315 --
Gear -- Single-speed
Saddle KROSS --
Headset FP-868 --
Derailleur Rear SHIMANO ACERA M360 --
Hub Front -- 9 x 135mm axle
Hub Rear MODE JA159F --
Cassette SHIMANO HG41 --
Chainrings 38T --
Bottom Bracket BAFANG 100mm, Square Taper, Sealed Cartridge Bearings
Headlamp -- LED Halo headlight
Taillamp -- Rear brake light
Tyres
Front KENDA K1010 29 X 2,2 20 x 4”
Rear KENDA K1010 29 X 2,2 20” x 4” All-Terrain Tires
Wheel / RIM ALUMINIUM Rims: 20" x 4" alloy with lightening cutouts
Brakes
Front TEKTRO M275 Tektro hydraulic alloy disc brakes, 2 piston
Rear TEKTRO M275 Tektro hydraulic alloy disc brakes, 2 piston
Brake Lever TEKTRO M275 --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Blue / Black Glossy Black, White, Army Green, Tan


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 20.7 kg 31.75 kg
Seat Height -- 300
Overview
Features -- Removable battery
Comes with aluminum cargo rack
Additional Details Travel : 100 MM
Freewheel Range : 11-34T
Saddle Bracket : Aluminium 30,9 X 350
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3971