KTM 150 XC-W 2023 vs Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Compare Specifications of KTM 150 XC-W 2023 and Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Selected Bikes

KTM 150 XC-W 2023
KTM 150 XC-W 2023

Brand:

Model:

Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E
Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 143.99 cc 149.40 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine 4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , OHV 2V
Engine Starting Kick and electric starter Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced and Splash
Clutch Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System Fuel injection Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Air-Cooled
Maximum Power -- 11.3 HP @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 10 NM @ 7500 RPM
Seating Capacity 1 2
Transmission 6-speed Chain
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Cradle / Steel
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 90/90-17 Tubeless
Rear -- 110/80-17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Spoke Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake 260 mm 240 mm Hydraulic Disk
Rear Disc brake 220 mm 130 mm Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm Telescopic 110 mm
Rear WP Xplor PDS shock absorber Unit Swing 58 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Red
Black
Green
Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2040 mm
Width -- 760 mm
Height -- 1070 mm
Weight 96.8 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 117
Seat Height 960 730
Wheelbase -- 1260 mm
Ground Clearance 370 mm 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features - Self Cleaning footpegs
- Seat
- NEKEN Handlebar
- One-piece aluminum swingarm
- Airbox
- Crankcases and engine covers
- Engine management system
- TPI Alternator
- Aggressive Sporty Design with Powerful engine (7.5/8.5kW) at a more affordable cost
- Sporty Double Seat with upright riding position makes everyday commuting more comfortable
- Better Steering and Riding Comfort with rear Mono-Shock suspension
- 14-Liter Fuel Sporty Tank looks better and goes further
Additional Details EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 310 Mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6297