KTM 150 XC-W TPI 2022 vs Yamaha 2020 YZF-R6

Compare Specifications of KTM 150 XC-W TPI 2022 and Yamaha 2020 YZF-R6

Selected Bikes

KTM 150 XC-W TPI 2022
KTM 150 XC-W TPI 2022

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2020 YZF-R6
Yamaha 2020 YZF-R6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement -- 599.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine DOHC inline 4-cylinder; 16 titanium valves
Engine Starting Kick and electric starter --
Clutch Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics Multiplate slipper clutch
Fuel System -- Fuel injection with YCC-T and YCC-I
Ignition -- TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive : Chain
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel --
Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front Dunlop Geomax AT81 tires 120/70ZR17
Rear Dunlop Geomax AT81 tires 180/55ZR17
Wheel / RIM Lightweight, CNC-machined hubs, high-end Giant rims and black spoke --
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc brake Dual 320 mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Rear 220 mm Disc brake 220 mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm
Suspension Travel : 310 mm
43 mm KYB inverted fork, 3-way adjustable; 4.7-in travel
Rear WP Xplor PDS shock absorber
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
KYB piggyback shock, 4-way adjustable; 4.7-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Team Yamaha Blue
Vivid Orange/Matte Raven Black
Raven


Physical Specs
Length -- 2039 mm
Width -- 696 mm
Height -- 1150 mm
Weight 96.8 kg --
Seat Height 960 851
Wheelbase -- 1374 mm
Ground Clearance 370 mm 129 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 21 litres
Overview
Features -- - Cutting Edge Engine Design
- Race-Tested Variable Intake System
- Compact Titanium Exhaust
- Stylish Instrumentation
- Adjustable Traction Control System
- Advanced Yamaha Chip Controlled Throttle
- Top-Notch Aerodynamics
- Aggressive R-Series Styling
Additional Details EMS : Continental EMS Rake (Caster Angle) : 24.0°
Trail : 3.8 in
Fuel Economy : 42 mpg
Wet Weight : 419 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7494