KTM 690 SMC R 2020 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Compare Specifications of KTM 690 SMC R 2020 and Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Selected Bikes

KTM 690 SMC R 2020
KTM 690 SMC R 2020

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 693.00 cc --
Engine Single-cylinder engine Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 74 hp 89 Hp @7400 rpm
Maximum Torque 73.5 Nm 110 Nm @ 3950 rpm
Transmission -- 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Chrome-molybdenum steel Tubular steel with aluminium cradle
Tyres
Front -- 90/90-21
Rear -- 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM Spoke Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disc Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Rear 240 mm Disc Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Suspension
Front 215 mm SUSPENSION TRAVEL Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel
Rear 240 mm SUSPENSION TRAVEL Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1250 mm
Kerb Weight 147 207
Handlebar Width 808 905
Seat Height 890 870
Wheelbase -- 1570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details CO2 EMISSIONS : 90 g/km
FUEL CONSUMPTION : 3.87 l/100 km
STEERING HEAD ANGLE : 63.6 °
Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with brushed high level silencers
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 5.09 in (129.2 mm)
Fuel Consumption : 4.9 l/100 km (58 MPG)
CO2 Figures : 113.0 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7551