Kumpan 54i:gnite vs Phat Phatty G3 Electric

Compare Specifications of Kumpan 54i:gnite and Phat Phatty G3 Electric

Selected Bikes

Kumpan 54i:gnite
Kumpan 54i:gnite

Brand:

Model:

Phat Phatty G3 Electric
Phat Phatty G3 Electric

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Brushless wheel hub motor 3000W motor
Charging Time -- 110W outlet in 4-6 hours with a standard 5amp charger
Maximum Power 7000 Watt --
Maximum Torque 141 Nm --
Load Carrying Capacity Permissible total weight : 280 kg --
Top Speed 100 kmph --
Battery Up to 3 removable lithium-ion batteries
51 V, 29 Ah, 1.5 kWh per battery (no memory effect)
23AH Battery
Display 7-inch touchscreen display --
Fork Hydraulic telescopic fork --
Headlamp -- LED headlight with high and low beams
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc Hydraulic disc
Rear Hydraulic disc Hydraulic disc
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 1950 mm --
Width 730 mm --
Height 1215 mm --
Weight 112 kg --
Seat Height 800 --
Wheelbase 1354 mm --
Overview
Features - Cruise control
- Kumpan Key App
- Over the air updates possible
- CBS equipment as standard
- Hydraulic shock absorbers (adjustable hardness)
- New magnetic deck system easily swaps out to give you a new look, any time - effortlessly!
- Upgraded battery management system for improved function, monitoring, and safety.
- New quick-release tray makes hot-swapping easier than ever
- Regenerative braking system with auto-engage downhill braking for safety and efficiency
- Increased handlebar strength for better durability.
- Premium seats for comfortable, sporty rides and customization opportunities.
- New anti-theft system
- All presales will include our AMP’d package with Rockford Fosgate Audio, RGB LED under lighting, and a customized seat!
Additional Details Distance above floor : 200 mm --
Accessories -- Rod Basket
Golf Carrier
Phat Pack Travel Bag
Phone holder
Cup holder
Rear-view mirrors
TireJect run flat sealant

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3271