KYMCO Agility 16 Plus 300i vs Yamaha Tricity 300

Compare Specifications of KYMCO Agility 16 Plus 300i and Yamaha Tricity 300

Selected Bikes

KYMCO Agility 16 Plus 300i
KYMCO Agility 16 Plus 300i

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 300
Yamaha Tricity 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 279.00 cc 292.00 cc
Engine OHC, four-stroke, 4-valve, single cylinder (Euro 4) Single cylinder, liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection Fuel Injection
Ignition ECU TCI
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 22.9 PS @ 8000 RPM 27.6 PS @ 7250 RPM
Maximum Torque 22.5 NM @ 6500 RPM 29.0 NM @ 5750 RPM
Transmission Twist and go CVT automatic V-Belt Automatic
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110 x 70 – 16 inch 120/70-14M/C 55P Tubeless
Rear 140 x 70 – 14 140/70-14M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brakes Hydraulic disc brake, Ø267 mm
Rear Hydraulic disc brakes Hydraulic single disc brake, Ø267 mm
ABS Bosch ABS braking system --
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork Double telescopic fork
Rear twin rear shock absorbers Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Matt Silver
Dark Blue
Nimbus Grey
Tech Kamo
Gunmetal Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2205 mm 2250 mm
Width 768 mm 815 mm
Height 1490 mm 1470 mm
Weight -- 239 kg
Kerb Weight 177 --
Seat Height 810 795
Wheelbase 1550 mm 1595 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.5 litres 13 litres
Overview
Features - Smart Noodoe Technology
- USB charge port, handy to charge devices on the go.
- Learner Approved Motorcycle Scheme (LAMS)
- Expansive and secure under seat compartment
- Keyless starting technology for easy start and stop operation
- 3-wheel Urban Mobility with Tricity DNA
- Economical and powerful 300cc BLUE CORE engine
- Standing Assist System
- Lightest in class / Autonomy
- Large storage space
- LCD instruments and high-quality finish
- Large diameter disc brakes
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 3.3 l / 100 km
CO2 emission : 77g / km
Front travel : 100 mm
Rear travel : 84 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9042