KYMCO Super 8 150X vs Yamaha 2021 135LC

Compare Specifications of KYMCO Super 8 150X and Yamaha 2021 135LC

Selected Bikes

KYMCO Super 8 150X
KYMCO Super 8 150X

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2021 135LC
Yamaha 2021 135LC

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 151.00 cc 134.00 cc
Engine SOHC 4-Stroke Single Cylinder
Engine Starting Electric/Kick Electric and Kick
Engine Lubrication -- Wet Sump
Clutch -- Automatic Centrifugal / Constant Mesh, Wet Multi – Plate
Fuel System 7500 RPM BS25 x 1
Ignition -- DC – CDI
Cooling System Forced Air --
Maximum Power 10.4 PS @ 7500 RPM 8.93 KW @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque 10.57 NM @ 7500 RPM 11.79 NM @ 5500 RPM
Transmission CVT Automatic Rotary Type 4-Speed
Frame -- Diamond
Headlamp -- 12v, 35W/35W
Tyres
Front 120/70-12 Dual Purpose Tires 70/90 – 17
Rear 3.50-17 130/70-12 Dual Purpose Tires 80/90 – 17
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Hydraulic Single Disc
Rear Drum Drum Brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Forks Telescopic
Rear Mono Shock Monocross
Colors Available
Colors Matte Orange
Matte Black
Fiery-Red
Cyan-Metalic
Stealth-Gold
Yamaha-Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1932 mm 1960 mm
Width 690 mm 695 mm
Height 1127 mm --
Kerb Weight 105 105
Seat Height 787 775
Wheelbase 1320 mm --
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 4.0 litres
Overview
Features - 66 miles per gallon est. (based on EPA data)
- High front fender clearance
- Dual purpose tires
- Heavy-duty shrouds to reduce scratching and breakage
- Naked styled handlebars for a sporty, dirt bike appearance
- Helmet locking posts
- Baggage hook and luggage carrier
- Flip up backrest can be used as a passenger seat
- Passenger foot pads
- Lockable under seat storage
- Cover Horn
- Air scoop
- Front Cover Under
Additional Details Estimated MPG : 66 mpg est (based on EPA data) Engine Oil Capacity : 0.9 litres
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.875
Secondary Reduction Ratio : 2.600
Gear Ratios : 1st: 2.833; 2nd: 1.875; 3rd: 1.353; 4th: 1.045

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4973