KYMCO Xciting 300i vs Yamaha Tricity 300 2022

Compare Specifications of KYMCO Xciting 300i and Yamaha Tricity 300 2022

Selected Bikes

KYMCO Xciting 300i
KYMCO Xciting 300i

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 300 2022
Yamaha Tricity 300 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 299.00 cc 292.00 cc
Engine 4S SOHC 4VALVE 4-valves, 4-stroke, Single cylinder, Liquid-cooled, EURO5, SOHC
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System Fuel Injection Fuel Injection
Ignition Electric TCI
Cooling System Liquid-Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 29 PS @ 7500 RPM 28 HP @ @ 7,250 rpm
Maximum Torque 30.1 NM @ 6250 RPM 29.0 Nm @ 5,750 rpm
Transmission CVT Automatic V-Belt Automatic
Charger 12v charger --
Display -- LCD Display
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70-14 120/70-14M/C 55P Tubeless
Rear 150/70-13 140/70-14M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc @ 260mm bosch ABS Hydraulic disc brake, Ø267 mm
Rear Disc @ 240mm bosch ABS Hydraulic single disc brake, Ø267 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic Double telescopic fork
Front travel : 100 mm
Rear Double Swing with 5 steps preload adjustment Unit Swing
Rear travel : 84 mm
Colors Available
Colors Matte White
Matte Black
Sand Grey
Petrol Blue
Gunmetal Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2121 mm 2250 mm
Width 785 mm 815 mm
Height 1280 mm 1470 mm
Weight -- 239 kg
Kerb Weight 168 --
Seat Height -- 795
Wheelbase 1450 mm 1595 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.0 litres 13 litres
Overview
Features - Multi-functional digital instrument panel
- Front and rear Bosch anti-lock braking system
- Large underseat compartment
- Stylish head and tail lamps
- Easy refueling front fuel filler opening
Traction Control System (TCS)
Large diameter disc brakes
3-wheel Urban Mobility with Tricity DNA
Standing Assist System
Lightest in class / Autonomy
Large storage space
LCD instruments and high-quality finish
Economical and powerful 300cc Blue Core EURO5-compliant engine
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption :3.3 l / 100 km
CO2 emission : 77 g / km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4427