Lapierre eSensium 300 Women Series vs MV Agusta Amo SV Limited

Compare Specifications of Lapierre eSensium 300 Women Series and MV Agusta Amo SV Limited

Selected Bikes

Lapierre eSensium 300 Women Series
Lapierre eSensium 300 Women Series

Brand:

Model:

MV Agusta Amo SV Limited
MV Agusta Amo SV Limited

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor EBIKE MOTION SYSTEM Mahle X35+
Speed -- Single speed
Battery 250 Wh BATTERY PACK --
Frame NEW E-SENSIUM WOMEN SUPREME 5 ALLOY with integrated routing Aluminium alloy
Stem LAPIERRE ALLOY with integrated routing 31,8mm 80mm(S) 90mm(M) 100mm(L) --
Handle Bar LAPIERRE ALLOY 38cm(S,M) 40cm(L) --
Fork NEW E-SENSIUM CARBON/ ALLOY STEERER --
Seatpost LAPIERRE ALLOY 27,2x350mm --
Grip -- Brooks Cambium
Crankset SHIMANO TIAGRA FC-R4700, 48X34T 170mm(S,M) 172.5mm(L) --
Pedals VP-335 Clips&Strap Shimano
Chain SHIMANO HG54 --
Shifters SHIMANO TIAGRA BR4725 2x10s FLATMOUNT w/o FIN with SMALL Hands levers --
Gear -- 55/20
Saddle SELLE ITALIA X3 XP LADY BOOST Brooks Cambium C17
Headset ACROS AIX-532 IS52/28,6 - IS52/40 --
Derailleur Front SHIMANO TIAGRA FD-R4700BM --
Derailleur Rear SHIMANO TIAGRA RD-R4700GS, 10s --
Sprocket SHIMANO HG500 10s 11-34T --
Bottom Bracket -- CNC
Tyres
Front CONTINENTAL Ultra Sport 2 SL 700X28 Pirelli Cycl-e DT Sport
Rear CONTINENTAL Ultra Sport 2 SL 700X28 Pirelli Cycl-e DT Sport
Wheel / RIM Spoke Rims: Aluminum
Brakes
Front SHIMANO RT66SS 160mm 6 bolts Magura MT4
Rear SHIMANO RT66SS 160mm 6 bolts --
Brake Lever SHIMANO TIAGRA BR4725 2x10s FLATMOUNT w/o FIN with SMALL Hands levers --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors White Matt Red
Glossy Yellow


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 14.8 kg --
Overview
Features - Pedal Assist
- Disc brakes for safety and powerful braking
--
Additional Details Size : S, M, L
Bottom bracket : SHIMANO BB-RS500
Bar tape : LAPIERRE TAPE
Wheelset : MACH1 820/ FAST ACE HUB 28T
Belt: Gates Carbon Drive CDX
Frame Size: S,M,L,XL

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5626