Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ)) vs Motomel S2 150 Full Alloy

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ)) vs Motomel S2 150 Full Alloy

Compare Specifications of Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ)) and Motomel S2 150 Full Alloy

Selected Bikes

Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ)) Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Motomel S2 150 Full Alloy Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	149.00 cc	149.50 cc
Engine	Vertical single-cylinder, water-cooled, four-stroke	High performance 4T single cylinder
Engine Starting	Electric/Kick Start	Electric and Kick
Clutch	Hand Clutched	Manual
Cooling System	--	Air Cooled
Maximum Power	12.5 Ps @ 8500 Rpm	13.4 PS at 8500rpm
Maximum Torque	11.5 Nm @ 6500 Rpm	--
Load Carrying Capacity	--	150 Kg
Transmission	5 Gears	5 speeds
Gear Shift Pattern	--	1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed	98 kmph	90 kmph
Headlamp	--	LED
Taillamp	--	LED

Tyres

Front	2.75-18	2,75 x 18
Rear	3.00-18	3,00 x 18
Wheel / RIM	Al - Alloy or Spoke	Alloy wheels

Brakes

Front	Disc	Disc Brake
Rear	Drum	Drum Brake

Suspension

Front	--	Hydraulic fork
Rear	--	Hydraulic shock absorbers

Colors Available

Colors

--

Black Blue Red White

Physical Specs

Length	2120 mm	1900 mm
Width	760 mm	665 mm
Height	1060 mm	1068 mm
Weight	126 kg	--
Kerb Weight	--	115
Seat Height	800	--
Wheelbase	1320 mm	--
Fuel Tank Capacity	11 litres	11 litres

Overview

Features	- Speedometer with Colorful Backlighting to read riding information at a glance - Classic round headlamp for brighter illumination and more energy efficient - Sharp tailight makes you Clearly visible at dark night - More loading space - More Reliability - Cargo Rack	- Sports digital dashboard - Side lighting LED technology - Inverted fork - Seat with double texture non-slip material
Additional Details	Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 2.3	Fuel Consumption : 2,2 Lts / 100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

6435