Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ)) vs Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Compare Specifications of Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ)) and Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Selected Bikes

Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ))
Lifan Amazing 150 (LF150-2C(Ⅳ))

Brand:

Model:

Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E
Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 149.00 cc 149.40 cc
Engine Vertical single-cylinder, water-cooled, four-stroke 4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , OHV 2V
Engine Starting Electric/Kick Start Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced and Splash
Clutch Hand Clutched Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 12.5 Ps @ 8500 Rpm 11.3 HP @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque 11.5 Nm @ 6500 Rpm 10 NM @ 7500 RPM
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 5 Gears Chain
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 98 kmph --
Frame -- Cradle / Steel
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 2.75-18 90/90-17 Tubeless
Rear 3.00-18 110/80-17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Al - Alloy or Spoke Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc 240 mm Hydraulic Disk
Rear Drum 130 mm Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic 110 mm
Rear -- Unit Swing 58 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Red
Black
Green
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2120 mm 2040 mm
Width 760 mm 760 mm
Height 1060 mm 1070 mm
Weight 126 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 117
Seat Height 800 730
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1260 mm
Ground Clearance -- 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features - Speedometer with Colorful Backlighting to read riding information at a glance
- Classic round headlamp for brighter illumination and more energy efficient
- Sharp tailight makes you Clearly visible at dark night
- More loading space
- More Reliability
- Cargo Rack
- Aggressive Sporty Design with Powerful engine (7.5/8.5kW) at a more affordable cost
- Sporty Double Seat with upright riding position makes everyday commuting more comfortable
- Better Steering and Riding Comfort with rear Mono-Shock suspension
- 14-Liter Fuel Sporty Tank looks better and goes further
Additional Details Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 2.3 --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1743