Lifan LF200ZH-3A vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Compare Specifications of Lifan LF200ZH-3A and Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Selected Bikes

Lifan LF200ZH-3A
Lifan LF200ZH-3A

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 197.00 cc --
Engine 4-stroke, air-cooled Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin
Engine Starting Electric/kick start --
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 14 Ps @ 8000 Rpm 89 Hp @7400 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.8 Nm @ 6500 Rpm 110 Nm @ 3950 rpm
Transmission 5 gears 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 60 kmph --
Frame -- Tubular steel with aluminium cradle
Tyres
Front 4.50-12 90/90-21
Rear 5.0-12 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM -- Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
Brakes
Front Drum Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Rear Drum Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Suspension
Front -- Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel
Rear -- Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 3440 mm --
Width 1300 mm --
Height 1360 mm 1250 mm
Weight 362 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 207
Handlebar Width -- 905
Seat Height -- 870
Wheelbase 2320 mm 1570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Three-Wheeler Model : LF200ZH-3A
Rear Track (mm) : 1040
Carriage Dimension (mm) : 1800×1250×480
Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 4.3
Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with brushed high level silencers
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 5.09 in (129.2 mm)
Fuel Consumption : 4.9 l/100 km (58 MPG)
CO2 Figures : 113.0 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3467