Lifan LF250ZH-HL vs Sherco 250 SEF-R

Compare Specifications of Lifan LF250ZH-HL and Sherco 250 SEF-R

Selected Bikes

Lifan LF250ZH-HL
Lifan LF250ZH-HL

Brand:

Model:

Sherco 250 SEF-R
Sherco 250 SEF-R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 250.00 cc 248.43 cc
Engine 4-stroke, air-cooled 4 stroke DOHC, 4 valve Sherco Technology
Engine Starting Electric/kick start Electric
Clutch -- Hydraulic, multidisc in oil bath
Fuel System -- Synerject digital electonic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 16 Ps @ 7000 Rpm --
Maximum Torque 16 Nm @ 6000 Rpm --
Transmission 5 gears 6 speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 60 kmph --
Battery -- 12 V / 4Ah Yuasa
Frame -- High strenght Chrome-Molybdenum steel semi-perimeter
Tyres
Front 4.50-12 1.60 x 21" Black rim with Michelin Enduro Competition
Rear 5.0-12 2.15 x 18" Black rim with Michelin Enduro Competition
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Drum 260 mm Brembo Hydraulic
Rear Drum 220 mm Brembo Hydraulic
Suspension
Front -- WP XPLOR fork, setting on the top 48 mm diameter with 300 mm of stroke
Rear -- WP Monoshock progressive rear suspension with aluminum control rods, adjustable for high and low speed compression and spring pre-load
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 3340 mm --
Width 1350 mm --
Height 1640 mm --
Weight 392 kg --
Wheelbase 2320 mm 1480 mm
Ground Clearance -- 355 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 9.7 litres
Overview
Features -- - Improved chassis for more flexibility and lightened
- New more powerful regulator with increased cooling capacity
- New intake and exhaust camshaft profile
- New 31 mm Ø intake valve and 26 mm Ø exhaust valve
- Modified bore diameter, 78mm Ø piston
- New HARD/SOFT injection mapping
- New clutch basket
- Lighter triple clamps
- WP XPLOR fork
- WP Shock absorber
- Black anodized Excel rims
- Lightener Michelin tires
Additional Details Three-Wheeler Model : LF250ZH-HL
Rear Track (mm) : 1140
Carriage Dimension (mm) : 1800×1350×590
Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 4.3
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3722