Liv Adore C/B 16 vs Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap

Compare Specifications of Liv Adore C/B 16 and Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap

Selected Bikes

Liv Adore C/B 16
Liv Adore C/B 16

Brand:

Model:

Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap
Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame ALUXX-Grade Aluminum Ultralight 500 Series OCLV Carbon, Ride Tuned performance tube optimization, tapered head tube, internal routing, Ride Tuned seatmast, DuoTrap S compatible, flat mount disc
Stem Alloy quill Bontrager Pro, 31.8 mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree
Handle Bar Giant Kids, middle high, 520 mm width Bontrager Elite VR-C, alloy, 31.8 mm
Fork High-tensile steel Emonda SL full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, flat mount disc
Seatpost Alloy, 25.4 x 200 mm Bontrager Ride Tuned carbon seatmast cap, 20 mm offset
Grip -- Bontrager Supertack Perf tape
Crankset High-tensile steel, 28t, 89 mm SRAM Force
Pedals Platform --
Chain KMC C410 SRAM Force, 12 speed
Shifters -- SRAM Force eTap AXS, 12 speed
Saddle Giant Kids Bontrager Montrose Comp, steel rails, 138 mm width
Headset -- FSA Integrated, sealed cartridge bearing, 1-1/8-inch top, 1.5-inch bottom
Derailleur Front -- SRAM Force eTap AXS, braze-on
Derailleur Rear -- SRAM Force eTap AXS, Orbit chain management, 33 T max cog
Hub Front Nutted, 20h --
Hub Rear Nutted, 20h --
Spoke 14g --
Cassette 16t SRAM Force XG-1270, 10-28, 12 speed
Chainrings -- 48 / 35
Bottom Bracket Loose ball --
Tyres
Front Innova IA-2094, 16 x 2.25 Bontrager R2 Hard-Case Lite, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 700 x 25 c
Rear Innova IA-2094, 16 x 2.25 Bontrager R2 Hard-Case Lite, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 700 x 25 c
Wheel / RIM Giant Kids 16", alloy --
Brakes
Front Coaster --
Rear Coaster --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Plum
Ice Green
Matte Black / Gloss Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Sizes : One size
Extras : Training wheels, bell, basket, protective pad
Axles
Front : 12 x 100 mm thru axle
Rear : 142 x 12 mm thru axle

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

433