Liv STP 26 Liv vs Rose The Bruce 1

Compare Specifications of Liv STP 26 Liv and Rose The Bruce 1

Selected Bikes

Liv STP 26 Liv
Liv STP 26 Liv

Brand:

Model:

Rose The Bruce 1
Rose The Bruce 1

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame ALUXX-Grade Aluminum, horizontal dropouts, integrated chain tensioner THE BRUCE, from approx. 2.0 kg Midnight Green L
Stem Forged alloy, 0-degree Reverse Black-ONE, Ø35 mm black/white 35 mm
Handle Bar Giant Sport, alloy, 31.8 Reverse Lead, 760 mm, 25 mm rise black/white Ø35 mm
Fork RockShox Recon Silver RL, 15 x 110 mm120 mm, with remote lockout Manitou Circus Expert, tapered, 15 x 100 TA, hexlock SL, air with steel coil spring black stealth 26"
Seatpost Alloy, two-bolt, 30.9 x 350 Reverse Nico Vink Signature black/white Ø30,9/300 mm
Grip -- Reverse STAMP black/black
Crankset Alloy forged, 30t Truvativ Descendant 6K Eagle DUB, BSA 73, 32 teeth black 165 mm
Pedals Platform --
Chain KMC X10 ROSE Singlespeed 1/2" x 1/8", 102 links black
Shifters Shimano --
Saddle Giant Sport Reverse Nico Vink Shovel & Shred black/white
Derailleur Rear Shimano Deore --
Hub Front Giant Disc, 28h, QR, alloy, disc --
Hub Rear Giant Disc, 28h, QR, alloy, disc --
Spoke Stainless, 14g --
Cassette Shimano CSM-4100, 11 x 46 --
Bottom Bracket Threaded --
Tyres
Front Maxxis Ardent, 26 x 2.25 Maxxis Ikon 26 x 2,35
Rear Maxxis Ardent, 26 x 2.25 Maxxis DTH 26 x 2,30
Wheel / RIM Giant 26", alloy, 28 mm inner width Rim: Reverse Base Light 559x26C / front: Reverse 15x100 TA / rear: Reverse 10x135, 13 teeth grau/schwarz
Brakes
Front Tektro HD-M275, hydraulic disc Shimano BL-MT200/BR-MT200, SM-RT26, 160 mm black
Rear Tektro HD-M275, hydraulic disc Shimano BL-MT200/BR-MT200, SM-RT26, 160 mm black
Brake Lever Tektro HD-M275 --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black Splash Blue
Midnight Green


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 11.5 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Sizes : Regular, Large Spacers : Alu Spacer 25 mm black

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4952